Category: High Street

High Street 4.5 — Radio Stars and Hemp TV (cont.)High Street 4.5 — Radio Stars and Hemp TV (cont.)

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 6:35 am

“Every writer in the country can write a beautiful sentence, or a hundred.  What I am interested in is the ugly sentence that is also somehow beautiful.  I agree that this is a highly-specialized enterprise.” — Donald Barthelme, “On ‘Paraguay’” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

High Street 4.5 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV” (cont.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 4.6 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV” (cont.))

High Street 4.4 — Radio Stars and Hemp TV (cont.)High Street 4.4 — Radio Stars and Hemp TV (cont.)

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 7:48 am

“Art’s project is fundamentally meliorative.  The aim of meditating about the world is finally to change the world.  It is this meliorative aspect of literature that provides its ethical dimension.” — Donald Barthelme, “Not-Knowing” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

High Street 4.4 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV” (cont.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 4.5 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV” (cont.))

High Street 4.3 — Radio Stars and Hemp TV (cont.)High Street 4.3 — Radio Stars and Hemp TV (cont.)

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 10:14 am

“Art cannot remain in one place.  A certain amount of movement, up, down, across, even a gallop toward the past, is a necessary precondition.” — Donald Barthelme, “Not-Knowing” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

High Street 4.3 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV” (cont.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 4.4 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV” (cont.))

High Street 4.2 — Radio Stars and Hemp TV (cont.)High Street 4.2 — Radio Stars and Hemp TV (cont.)

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 1:59 pm

“Art is a true account of the activity of mind.  Because consciousness, in Husserl’s formulation, is always consciousness of something, art thinks ever of the world, cannot not think of the world, could not turn its back on the world even if it wished to.” — Donald Barthelme, “Not-Knowing” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger, emphasis in original)

High Street 4.2 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV” (cont.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 4.3 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV” (cont.))

High Street 3.10 — Downhill Racing (fin.)High Street 3.10 — Downhill Racing (fin.)

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 5:33 am

“Art is always a meditation upon external reality rather than a representation of external reality or a jackleg attempt to ‘be’ external reality.” — Donald Barthelme, “Not-Knowing” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

High Street 3.10 — “Downhill Racing” (fin.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 4.1 — “Radio Stars and Hemp TV”)

High Street 3.9 — Downhill Racing (cont.)High Street 3.9 — Downhill Racing (cont.)

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 6:37 am

“When computers learn how to make jokes, artists will be in serious trouble.  But artists will respond in such a way as to make art impossible for the computer.  They will redefine art to take into account (that is, to exclude) technology–photography’s impact upon painting and painting’s brilliant response being a clear and comparatively recent example.” — Donald Barthelme, “Not-Knowing” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

High Street 3.9 — “Downhill Racing” (cont.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 3.10 — “Downhill Racing” (fin.))

High Street 3.8 — Downhill Racing (cont.)High Street 3.8 — Downhill Racing (cont.)

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 7:24 am

“The combinatorial agility of words, the exponential generation of meaning once they’re allowed to go to bed together, allows the writer to surprise himself, makes art possible, reveals how much of Being we haven’t yet encountered.” — Donald Barthelme, “Not-Knowing” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

High Street 3.8 — “Downhill Racing” (cont.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 3.9 — “Downhill Racing” (cont.))

High Street 3.6 — Downhill Racing (cont.)High Street 3.6 — Downhill Racing (cont.)

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 10:43 am

“If the writer is taken to be the work’s way of getting itself written, a sort of lightning rod for an accumulation of atmospheric disturbances, a St. Sebastian absorbing in his tattered breast the arrows of the Zeitgeist, this changes not very much the traditional view of the artist.  But it does license a very great deal of critical imperialism.  This is fun for everyone.” — Donald Barthelme, “Not-Knowing” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

High Street 3.6 — “Downhill Racing” (cont.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 3.7 — “Downhill Racing” (cont.))

High Street 3.4 — Downhill Racing (cont.)High Street 3.4 — Downhill Racing (cont.)

Tetman Callis 2 Comments 6:13 am

“Not-knowing is crucial to art, is what permits art to be made.  Without the scanning process engendered by not-knowing, without the possibility of having the mind move in unanticipated directions, there would be no invention.” — Donald Barthelme, “Not-Knowing” (from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

High Street 3.4 — “Downhill Racing” (cont.) is posted today.

(Tomorrow: High Street 3.5 — “Downhill Racing” (cont.))

For your pleasure we offer kick-boxing or skeet-shootingFor your pleasure we offer kick-boxing or skeet-shooting

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 6:03 am

“Sometimes I think that there will be a place in the future for a literature the nature of which will singularly resemble that of a sport.  Let us subtract, from literary possibilities, everything which today, by the direct expression of things and the direct stimulation of the sensibility by new means–motion pictures, omnipresent music, etc.–is being rendered useless or ineffective for the art of language.  Let us also subtract a whole category of subjects–psychological, sociological, etc.–which the growing precision of the sciences will render it difficult to treat freely.  There will remain to letters a private domain: that of symbolic expression and of imaginative values due to the free combination of the elements of language.” — Paul Valery (quoted in “After Joyce,” from Not-Knowing, ed. Herzinger)

Getting it rightGetting it right

Tetman Callis 0 Comments 6:29 am

“[Henry] James was the most consummate artist American literature has produced. He was fastidious by nature and by early training. He had studied his art in France as men study sculpture in Italy, and he had learned the French mastery of form. Nowhere in his writings may we find slovenly work. His opening and closing paragraphs are always models, his dialogue moves naturally and inevitably,—in all the story despite its length nothing too much,—and everywhere a brilliancy new in American fiction. He is seldom spontaneous; always is he the conscious artist; always is he intellectual; always is he working in the clay of actual life, a realist who never forgets his problem to soar into the uncharted and the unscientific realms of the metaphysical and the romantic.” — Fred Lewis Pattee (from The Cambridge History of English and American Literature, Vol. XVI, Book III, Part VI., Sec. 9)